Buridan's Donkey: Paradox about an animal starving to death

Buridan's Donkey paradox, named after the French nominalist philosopher Jean Buridan, is a thought experiment that pushes man to think.
buridan's donkey (buridan's ass) refers to the catatonic situation that the donkey, which has a bunch of herbs on the right and a bunch of herbs of the same quality and amount to the left, and which is exactly the same distance from both beams, has entered into a rational choice.

there is no reason for the donkey to prefer the right side to the left side, again there is no reason to prefer the left side to the right side; hence he is starving.

If the desire is a product of the hierarchy between the values of the preferences, the desire no longer exists when the values are equalized (which can also be at 0). Without desire, there is no movement. Without motion, there is no life.
This story, attributed to the 14th century nominalist jean buridan, who tackled the problem of freedom of will, was used to support the understanding of free will.

Based on this, it has been suggested that if a person encounters a similar situation, he can overcome the balance of opposing motifs with his free will.
leibniz criticizes this donkey in two ways;

such a situation never arises. because actions that cannot be preferred among them should be identical in all respects. this one.

this is against the principle of sufficient reason saying "nothing happens without a deterministic reason or at least a reason", which is two!
Previous Post Next Post

Related Posts