1.0 Can You Buy a Motor Car?

Technology is developing day by day and the engines of the cars are also affected by this technology. The amount of liters it was before, and now it's a little different. Does it make sense to buy a car with 1.0 (1 liter) engine? We've put together a few different views.
1.0 engine cars of course "not going", not enough for the human to go
there is no point in coming to the gas of the stories of kara murat, which is the only way to exaggerate the nationalist of the car it is driving. Do not think that the a3, golf, octavia etc. vehicles with 115 hp 1.0 tsi will pass a corolla of 132 hp. Now, how many people are going to enter or enter the entry, or my message, my answer is: if you have experienced such experience (s) know that the person (s) who drive the corolla (s) can not drive. you can't survive with a car like this, with a manual gear shift corolla driving a person who knows how to use the gears correctly. so please don't exaggerate.

On the other hand, I think yes to the downsizing school, but I think that the shit is now removed. The 1.0 engine segment c cannot drive a car and the turbo will run. There are certain drawbacks to the turbocharger: the car becomes more sensitive to the fuel quality, the spark plugs into the ignition system quickly finishes, the cost of maintenance in general is higher, the fault is more likely to remove the reliability is reduced. Troubles start when you drive a car equipped with dsg in particular. This car, which is not driven by a turbo, is forced to move until the engine reaches the speed of 1500 rpm. The gearbox is forced into semi-clutch, so that the engine can be upgraded and supported by the turbo, so the car can move. The 1500 rpm band corresponds to a speed of roughly 17 km / h in 2nd gear. As long as you go under this girl, the permanent wound remains in grip and you eat from the grip life.

If you can't think of the engineers who make the car think of course, they think, but the car's longevity, low maintenance costs, less trouble, etc. I don't think engineers care much. they are focusing on parameters that are much more effective in selling the car, such as emissions, in terms of performance, fuel consumption and emissions. how many people take the car "how many thousand kilometers it goes," he thinks or how many cents per kilometer more importance than that?

As a result, I'll finish by writing this to make sure that there isn't an entry written for dressing in the VW band. I say downsizing 's more down the shit.
.....
If this engine is taken first, it is taken
taken in the city. The maximum torque cycles in stop and stop traffic do not burn because they are lower speeds. b. The case should be light, so that it can pull the case, not on the ramp.

the torque is not only about the engine. The gearbox is also important here. The gear ratios of these vehicles are short-term to have torque, so it is necessary to go to high speeds to go at inter-city speed limits. this means that the high-pressure motor is already more pooped to achieve power, engine noise, and fuel consumption that would not be expected from a small engine. Although 7 gear, they did this thing. they can't go long enough.

we said way, high speed can not be done. The turbo is adjusted so that it is immediately switched on at lower speeds. so some friends say, "aeebi do not understand the turbo do not call la do". but this time he drowns at the top. When he passes 140, he's stuck.

But I would like to reiterate that it is perfect for urban use. ecoboost is the king. consider the lightweight options.


Let's get clear that tsi motors can be examined under 2 titles
twincharged stratified injection: these engines have both turbo and compressor. they usually put on high-horsepower models.

turbocharged stratified injection: these are the only turbo. no compressor.

now I come to the simple, 1.0 tsi engine in the compressor .. there is no compressor in the vehicle behind each tsi ..

The amphitheater, the turbocharger with the supercharger, the air, the air is flying, the combustion chamber, which is the size of that pet bottle, is hardly dependent on the pressure of the turbo, and a compressor. I wish you had something to do with the German engineers you praised it very clever.
The downsizing is very accurate, but the 1.0 engine did not fall much further. this is not for downsizing engines, these engines are removing their vehicles in order to sell arms to countries where taxes such as turkey. So in this case, we should criticize and question the choice of the engine is not the choice.
driving characteristics of a motor, torque and horsepower that it can produce according to gears
If today's 1.0 motor vehicle has a similar weight, similar torque and hp data as a vehicle of thirty years ago, it has similar driving characteristics.

Let's see now. Let's compare a ford taunus with a low-torque, low-hp hyundai i10 and a 1980 model, 2-liter engine.

need to clarify. The engine of the hyundai i10 is a three cylinder, 1 liter kappa engine. Aluminum cylinder with lid, total dry weight 75 kg. 70 ps power and 97 nm torque.

ford taunus motor is 2 liters pinto. Factory code with TL20L. 57 kW (76 hp) and 115 nm torque at 2800 rpm.

the results in the example I have given are quite similar data, even on paper, the taunus has a little better data, but the small (!), there is a very important difference:

The hyundai model starts at 933 kg and ford taunus starts at 1.480 kg.

This is the most important difference, but the differences are not limited to them. air friction coefficient, safety features, braking distance, turning diameter of the two small vehicles with the slightest similarity in question.

I know comparing apples to pears. but two liters of pears. the gutter groove burns gas and can only release half the power of the harpoon. As a result, all data such as gearshift acceleration, 0-100 km acceleration, all in favor of that tiny engine. and a lot. that is, if you take a one-liter hyundaiden and have a two-liter ford, the feeling is that you can get out of the car and ride on the cart.

what is that? one liter two liters faso fiso. The driving characteristics of a vehicle only and only the data of the engine, bodywork and technology are determined.

I need to add a few more notes on the following
I have a few personal experiences in the city, inter-city with a liter engine:

1) Gasoline engine has less gasoline consumption, but even in city jokes. even when I use it at the highest speeds, it is not possible to reach six liters per hundred kilometers. In the traffic for the city, it is possible to collide with big motor vehicles, but because there is not much distance to accelerate, we arrive at the same time as the Mercedes and Mercedes.

but mine is fast slow, turning around 5.6 liters of consumption. urban

2) On the inter-city road, the speed of 3.7 liters can be reached with funny data but I'm sorry to use it slowly.

so I'm going to be 150 km / h with no gasoline. there is an interesting feature. engine burns even when the engine goes fast. 1.6 liters, the one that is introduced to the economy, the 150-groove groove groove gasoline to be accustomed to drinking, this one-liter engine is my favorite side. I don't have to worry about how to use it economically, because I'll use it if I use it, and it turns out that the data is saving.

3) Long distance to the interurban creek does not have the slightest annoyance. you'll only know how to downshift the gear when needed. engine does not drown unless you climb up the hill with the fifth gear.

4) the three cylinder engine is easy to wear the rumor of a hundred thousand km did not observe. I don't know, maybe it's gonna get old in a second hundred. but my previous cars have caused dozens of problems until this mile. Don't touch the evil eye, three cylinders are now zero problem, one hundred percent yield.
Previous Post Next Post